Website - What do you think?

[Bob Wright]

I have total redone my website at http://www.abilenetrinity.org What do you think about the layout?

[G R 'Scott' Cundiff]

Just a design suggestion Bob --- I would put more information on the home page rather than having people have to click on links -- for instance, the schedule can be on the home page rather than on a page by itself, the same with the activities page. Generally speaking, less clicks is better than more.

IMHO at least!

I have total redone my website at http://www.abilenetrinity.org What do you think about the layout?

[Dave McClung]

I have total redone my website at http://www.abilenetrinity.org What do you think about the layout?

I like it except ....

Where is the link to NazNet?

[Mark Bolerjack]

It's a good site, but such a strange time for an evening service:
Sunday evening at 6:00 AM!


I have total redone my website at http://www.abilenetrinity.org What do you think about the layout?

[Bob Wright]

Mark, as many times as I looked at that page the obvious time error was overlooked. I have made the correction. Thanks!
Scott, I designed the website so that on a resolution of 1024x768, there would be no need to scroll on any page. A simple click on the link will send a person to that page. Eight clicks and I can go through the entire website; since the links are always in view. To me that is much easier, but I'll keep it in mind.
Dave, Naznet is the default link on the Links page, all you need to do is click on the "Go there >>" button. (I changed the link go directly to Naznet Central, it is slower for me, but I can understand that new people would need to go there first.) Thanks.
Thanks for all the input; I really appreciate it.

[Adam Spriggs]

I think it's better to stay away from HTML framesets.

It's not as big of an issue now with the popularity of IE 6 and Firefox, but some people with older computers (or browser versions) may have issues displaying pages with frames.

http://www.htmlhelp.com/design/frames/whatswrong.html

[G R 'Scott' Cundiff]

Scott, I designed the website so that on a resolution of 1024x768, there would be no need to scroll on any page. A simple click on the link will send a person to that page. Eight clicks and I can go through the entire website; since the links are always in view. To me that is much easier, but I'll keep it in mind.

No problem Bob, I don't really agree, but it may be in the eye of the beholder. I will note that I have never seen a major website on the internet designed like that, but again, there may be a million of them and I just haven't seen them.

Web design is always interesting to me and I enjoy looking at (and learn from) what other people do.

[Gina Stevenson]

Yes, that's nice to keep the relics in mind ... afterall, I can't forget them, since I basically had the same until this September. ;)

Thanks for such a reminder.

While we're at it, if you read this post, why do I suddenly lose my cursor, have to just click around, space, type, whatever to find it again!? Weird! Sometimes I've lost sight of it for a good while, and -- like this time -- it suddenly showed up again, so I didn't have to just type & hope I was in the right place.

Thanks!

I think it's better to stay away from HTML framesets.

It's not as big of an issue now with the popularity of IE 6 and Firefox, but some people with older computers (or browser versions) may have issues displaying pages with frames.

http://www.htmlhelp.com/design/frames/whatswrong.html