Eric Frey
24th June 2008, 04:08 PM (16:08)
In Called Unto Holiness Timothy Smith wrote:
Widney attempted to explain why a new denomination was required. The reason, he said, was that the machinery and the methods of the older churches had proved a hindrance to the work of evangelizing the poor (pp 110-111).
When I read that, I thought about the discussions here. A couple questions came to mind on the Eve of our centennial celebration.
1) Do we, after 100 years, find this to be a valid reason to leave a church and start another?
2) After only 100 years, it seems we are back to the original question. How do we make sure history doesn't repeat itself in the next 100 years?
3) In a Nazarene history class there was a debate about whether the founders' "sprint to evangelize the world" didn't become a great hinderance in the "marathon of time." When connecting organization to mission (as Widney did) how do we balance the need for deep and wide roots with the desire to grow a tall and expansive tree? Have we grown the tree faster than the roots? Are we well positioned to see our mission continue in both the new works of growth around the world and in the old roots?
Just some thoughts/obersvations. How do you respond to Widney's
Widney attempted to explain why a new denomination was required. The reason, he said, was that the machinery and the methods of the older churches had proved a hindrance to the work of evangelizing the poor (pp 110-111).
When I read that, I thought about the discussions here. A couple questions came to mind on the Eve of our centennial celebration.
1) Do we, after 100 years, find this to be a valid reason to leave a church and start another?
2) After only 100 years, it seems we are back to the original question. How do we make sure history doesn't repeat itself in the next 100 years?
3) In a Nazarene history class there was a debate about whether the founders' "sprint to evangelize the world" didn't become a great hinderance in the "marathon of time." When connecting organization to mission (as Widney did) how do we balance the need for deep and wide roots with the desire to grow a tall and expansive tree? Have we grown the tree faster than the roots? Are we well positioned to see our mission continue in both the new works of growth around the world and in the old roots?
Just some thoughts/obersvations. How do you respond to Widney's