Shea Zellweger
May 5th, 2010, 12:11 PM
After the Taser incident on monday (http://espn.go.com/blog/sportscenter/post/_/id/49222/police-use-taser-gun-on-phillies-fan) (5/3) at Citizen's Bank Park, another Phan ran out on the field last night (http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/recap?gid=300504122)(5/4). After the incident. Cole Hamels gave up consecutive doubles, ruining his shutout.
considering the amount of credit the "tenth man" were taking for Johan Santana walking Jamie Moyer (http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/recap?gid=300502122) Sunday (5/2) and ultimately turning the tide of the game, do they deserve equal blame for chanting "tase him! tase him!" while the fan on Tuesday night was being escorted off the field, apparently disrupting Hamels' rhythm? I know the Phillies eventually won the game, but I think this brings up a larger question- if fans think they are capable of influencing games in such a way that helps their team, how often do they deserve the blame for a loss, particularly in markets where it's commonplace to boo the home team?
considering the amount of credit the "tenth man" were taking for Johan Santana walking Jamie Moyer (http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/recap?gid=300502122) Sunday (5/2) and ultimately turning the tide of the game, do they deserve equal blame for chanting "tase him! tase him!" while the fan on Tuesday night was being escorted off the field, apparently disrupting Hamels' rhythm? I know the Phillies eventually won the game, but I think this brings up a larger question- if fans think they are capable of influencing games in such a way that helps their team, how often do they deserve the blame for a loss, particularly in markets where it's commonplace to boo the home team?