PDA

View Full Version : Scott, can you tell me why . . .


Dennis M. Scott
22nd November 2006, 07:51 PM (19:51)
. . . sometimes it seems like nobody will respond to my threads? Scott? . . .Scott? . . .hey, Scott? . . . .

. . . oh well, forget it.

Marsha Lynn
22nd November 2006, 10:10 PM (22:10)
. . . sometimes it seems like nobody will respond to my threads? Scott? . . .Scott? . . .hey, Scott? . . . .

. . . oh well, forget it.

I would respond except that you weren't talking to me ... so I won't.

Maybe another time when you're open to conversation with more than just Scott.

Everybody always wants to talk to Scott. I think you're all just trying to get on his good side so he doesn't put black marks on the chalkboard next to your name.

Oh, the dreaded points. I may start having nightmares about private messages telling me I'm on probation at NazNet.

Or maybe I'll stick to the ones where it's time for Sunday School to start and the room is full of people - visitors even!- and I forgot to study my lesson.

I hope Scott responds to you, Dennis, and you can get beyond this fear of dropping your posts into a NazNet vacuum.

:fav16

Marsha

G R 'Scott' Cundiff
22nd November 2006, 10:27 PM (22:27)
. . . sometimes it seems like nobody will respond to my threads? Scott? . . .Scott? . . .hey, Scott? . . . .

. . . oh well, forget it.

No I can't.

G R 'Scott' Cundiff
22nd November 2006, 10:30 PM (22:30)
I would respond except that you weren't talking to me ... so I won't.

Maybe another time when you're open to conversation with more than just Scott.

Everybody always wants to talk to Scott. I think you're all just trying to get on his good side so he doesn't put black marks on the chalkboard next to your name.

Oh, the dreaded points. I may start having nightmares about private messages telling me I'm on probation at NazNet.

Or maybe I'll stick to the ones where it's time for Sunday School to start and the room is full of people - visitors even!- and I forgot to study my lesson.

I hope Scott responds to you, Dennis, and you can get beyond this fear of dropping your posts into a NazNet vacuum.

:fav16

Marsha


Hi Ya Marsha -- sure nice responding to your posts. As you can guess you are a prime candidate for getting black marks on NazNet -- always breaking the rules as you do.

Yep, you had better walk the narrow line.

Actually, I didn't have anything to say to you, but since Dennis went out of his way to ask me about people not responding to his posts, I thought I would go out of my way to respond to yours.

So I did.

I'm finished responding now.

As you were.

If you've got 'em smoke 'em.

Let's be careful out there.

Dave McClung
22nd November 2006, 11:38 PM (23:38)
. . . sometimes it seems like nobody will respond to my threads? Scott? . . .Scott? . . .hey, Scott? . . . .

. . . oh well, forget it.

I don't know either, but thanks for responding to my grandparent posts. We grandparents need to stick together.

Marg Webb
23rd November 2006, 12:49 AM (00:49)
Dennis, NO ONE RESPONDS TO ME EITHER!!:)
I thought I would quit and than I thought, no there just might be someone out there LURKING that would feel sorry for me and join and write to me.
So that is my feelings at this time.

Dennis M. Scott
23rd November 2006, 11:40 AM (11:40)
Truthfully, Marg, as I get older and a little more forgetful, I have this recurring nightmare: People respond to things that I say with what is obviously a meaningful response, and I'm not able to remember what I said in the first place. Maybe sometime a bunch of us could get together and just look at each other and smile a little bit. We wouldn't have to say anything or respond to anything: just sit around and appreciate each other. :rolleyes:

Marsha Lynn
23rd November 2006, 06:30 PM (18:30)
It could be worse, you know. You could get responses from people who say they are only responding to you in reaction to somebody else's post and that they don't actually have anything to say to you.

Has anyone seen a miff tree around here? I may need a turn in it.

:gen02

Marsha

G R 'Scott' Cundiff
23rd November 2006, 06:59 PM (18:59)
Well, hello again Marsha -- here I am responding to another of your posts.

All I can say is that it would take a fiendishly clever person to do such a thing as you imply.


It could be worse, you know. You could get responses from people who say they are only responding to you in reaction to somebody else's post and that they don't actually have anything to say to you.

Has anyone seen a miff tree around here? I may need a turn in it.

:gen02

Marsha

Marg Webb
23rd November 2006, 10:19 PM (22:19)
It could be worse, you know. You could get responses from people who say they are only responding to you in reaction to somebody else's post and that they don't actually have anything to say to you.

Has anyone seen a miff tree around here? I may need a turn in it.

:gen02

Marsha
Marsha, what's a "miff tree". :):)

Marg Webb
23rd November 2006, 11:01 PM (23:01)
Truthfully, Marg, as I get older and a little more forgetful, I have this recurring nightmare: People respond to things that I say with what is obviously a meaningful response, and I'm not able to remember what I said in the first place. Maybe sometime a bunch of us could get together and just look at each other and smile a little bit. We wouldn't have to say anything or respond to anything: just sit around and appreciate each other. :rolleyes:

Scott, that is called,"sitting and drooling" I think. Not ready for that yet:)

Marsha Lynn
23rd November 2006, 11:15 PM (23:15)
Marsha, what's a "miff tree". :):)

Marg, if you've made it this long without encountering miffed people sitting in their miff trees, far be it from me to introduce you to the concept. I suppose it does show my age to speak of such things, however. It's a term one doesn't hear much anymore, isn't it? Is that because people no longer get miffed?

:rolleyes:

Marsha