PDA

View Full Version : The Love Feast


BobHunt
21st January 2007, 12:34 PM (12:34)
It has been brought to my attention more and more of the importance and significance of the Love Feast. Sharing meals together was a crucial part of early church life. There were certain instructions given not only about what to eat, but also of who NOT to eat it with. God's people were warned not to eat meat that had been sacrificed to idols and if they did, not to eat it with the pagans in their temple feasts or they would become "participants with demons."
Jesus set an example by welcoming to the table fellowship all who would come. The early church continued this practice and members often met together in people's homes to share food. Remember the events of Acts 2:42? "They devoted themselves to the apostle's teaching and to the fellowship, to the breaking of bread and to prayer." Certain Jewish and Greco-Roman religious associations also met for common meals, and at times behaviour at pagan communal meals could become extremely disorderly. For Christians, however, the shared meal was such a powerful emblem of their love in Christ, that it came to be called a "love feast."
Jesus also instituted the Eucharist (The Lord's Supper) and it is difficult to ascertain the relationship between the Eucharist and the "love feast." Were they one and the same or two different events? The most likely answer is that in the early church no firm distinction was made between the two.

When I come to the Lord's Supper, sometimes it seems as if I can see the Lord looking down over the portals of Heaven saying to me, "Son, if I had to go all the way to Calvary again, I would do it just for you." Thinking about this, breaks a person up and you realize how important it is to have and to keep a close relationship with the Lord. To keep this relationship fresh and unhindered, it must be worked on, on a daily basis.

There are many times, I suppose that we all gather together as a church for a meal, a potluck, or even a casserole. What if we turned these times into a Christian love feast, a time of expressing concerns for the events that are happening in our brothers and sister's lives, many of which are troubling them? What if we turned these times into scenes of one encouraging another, of praying one for the other, or making sure no one among us is hungry either spiritually or physically? And what if we turned these times into moments of coming together, forgiving one another, getting rid of all the prejudices, and grudges?

David Cash
21st January 2007, 05:39 PM (17:39)
The independent church I was part of before coming to the church of the Nazarene did a potluck every Sunday. It did get to be a bit of a drag, especially for the ladies who usually wound up doing the cooking. On the other hand, I think my friendships with people in that church ran deeper than they have with any other church.

Incidentally, that church also had communion every Sunday, but during the service, not the potluck. That was ok, too.

I have one concern, however, and that is with those people who would insist that the church service be based around a meal as that is the way they interpret the love feast. (This thinking is common in the house church movement. I've been involved in a couple of churches that met in homes, but I'm still a bit not excited about some elements taught by some proponents of that movement.)

I guess my conclusion is that church meals can be a time for real bonding and a chance for us to enrich each other spiritually etc., but that we don't necessarily have a Biblical mandate for every Sunday.

David Cash

Anne and Dwayne Hood
22nd January 2007, 12:20 AM (00:20)
Would you believe?--We know a Nazarene minister who had communtion with the people around tables in the church kitchen--using oranges.