The blade of an argument cuts both ways. I joined Naznet because I din't like how some very vocal people here were defining my views of inerrancy and fundamentalism. To demonstrate the inadequacy of defining someone else's views for them I offer the following chart. Not for its accuracy, but because it describes what I hear when someone here calls out the dependent clause from article IV "in all things necessary to our salvation". I don't yet separate (I don't have enough resolution in my thoughts), to separate Open or Process Theology from my Idea of Emergent and Post-Modern Ideology. All 4 ideas look very similar to me and seem to come from the same root-cause.
So this chart adquately describes how my brain rolls (what I think you say) when you tell me that all scripture is not inspired or not necessary to our salvation. Here's your chance teach me.