http://www.ewtn.com/tv/live/journeyhome.asp
reflections?
http://www.ewtn.com/tv/live/journeyhome.asp
reflections?
Ummm, it's an hour long? Sorry, I don't have time to watch the whole thing. But you have given a clue which is "authority" I think that is a reason why many have made as the RCC would say "the journey home." I don't suspect that I will be making that particular trip as my journey has been in the opposite direction. But yeah, authority and security of belief is important and it's attractive to folks. Despite all the talk of post modernism, folks still hold a place in their heart for something concrete and secure, the RCC offers this. I fear that our church will be in decline so long as we remain in flux regarding our identity, I believe that folks yearn for stability and authority. The object of my authority is in the Scriptures rather than the church, but for those who value church authority, the RCC is clearly the way to go.
-Jim
To know and to serve God, of course, is why we're here, a clear truth, that, like the nose on your face, is near at hand and easily discernible but can make you dizzy if you try to focus on it hard. But a little faith will see you through.
Garrison Keillor
Originally Posted by Jim Chabot
Originally Posted by Kami Tuenning
These comments are a bit curious, and seem to flow from an under-developed, or less-than-accurate understanding of postmodernism and postmodern theology that seems rampant among many "modernist" and quasi/pseudo modernist Christians whom I know.Originally Posted by Jim Chabot
Postmodernity has nothing to do with being wavering, and is not itself in opposition to anything fixed or unchanging. It is directly opposed to the certainty of modern philosophy, grounded in the confidence of human progress, most specifically the certainty of the philosophy of Hegel and his concept of progress..... which eventually found us at the realization of the lack of progress, and the utter lack of reason for confidence in humanity.... Two World Wars and the Holocaust.
Many great Christian theologians have been "postmodernist", and in no way has it typically been "temporal" nor anything like "adolescence."
If you want a deep, rich, unchanging, other-worldly theology from a postmodern Catholic, I suggest you read either of these two books:
God Without Being - Jean-Luc Marion
The Erotic Phenomenon - Jean-Luc Marion
- Ben
Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death! And to those in the tombs, bestowing life!
Χριστὸς ἀνέστη ἐκ νεκρῶν, θανάτῳ θάνατον πατήσας! καὶ τοῖς ἐν τοῖς μνήμασι, ζωὴν χαρισάμενος!
I don't think that either one of us spoke directly to the theology itself or even to the mindset. Rather we spoke to the observation that this is something that most folks grow out of. And further that we speak not of scholars and theologians but rather to the unwashed masses. I don't mean this to be unkind in any way, just an observation that this is a passing phase in so many people. It's been a while since I've read Barna's thoughts on this, I do believe that this was his attribution as to why folks would be flocking to solid, unchanging, and authoritative theology.
-Jim
To know and to serve God, of course, is why we're here, a clear truth, that, like the nose on your face, is near at hand and easily discernible but can make you dizzy if you try to focus on it hard. But a little faith will see you through.
Garrison Keillor
We just had another thread with an hour long video. I wonder if this will attract as much attention. And to be honest, Tami, would you like us to go to Catholic message boards and post vdeos on why people left the Catholic Chirch?
I am the Lone Locust of the Apocalypse! Think of me when you look to the night sky!
"No scripture can mean that God is not love, or that his mercy is not over all his works" (John Wesley - Free Grace, 26)
Oh, I have a very strong bias and I'm allergic to anything that even remotely looks like it. Thought that was obvious by now. I hate proselyting among Christians. "Go and make disciples of all nations" was the command, it was not "go and make all Christians submit to the bishop or Rome, the Westminster Confession, the Manual of the CotN or whatever".
"No scripture can mean that God is not love, or that his mercy is not over all his works" (John Wesley - Free Grace, 26)
Enjoyed his testimony; thrilled that he has found his spiritual home........ yet, in the end it is all about following Jesus Christ within his body, the Church, catholic and apostolic.
The RCC certainly doesn't have a monopoly upon being the only or even the "prime" apostolically authoritative church!
The whole idea of Christ's authority being given to the church through the Apostles is fine, and yet even a rudamentary study of church history would indicate that it took three centuries before the (Metropolitan) Bishop of Rome became the main authority in the west. The church continued to grow and witness in the east and other parts of the world not under the authority of Rome.
Likewise in the west, the church also grew and prospered under the leadership of the Bishop (Pope) of Rome. However, the church slumped into apostasy under the leadership of worldly ambitious and corrupt popes. By the time of the Reformation, the church had generally lost its way, with mostly biblically illiterate clergy and an over emphasis upon liturgy (in Latin only) iconology and the corrupt sale of indulgences. Many in the Catholic church were calling for change, some like Luther wanted minimal changes, others like the Anabaptists called for wholesale changes. Yet, by the time the Reformation dust had settled, that which remained of the Roman Catholic church also was reformed, and was no longer as spiritually bankrupt as it once was prior to the time when the Reformation began...... although very antagonistic towards the Protestants. Those on the "Protestant catholic" side were certainly much different to the original catholic church from which they had emerged. It has been said that one church went into the Reformation but Five Christian movements came out the other side; one of which was the Catholic church ruled from Rome. Given that the Spirit of God was also at work with in the lives of those who were in the other movements (i.e. Reformed, Lutheran, Anabaptist, Anglican) can the Roman Catholic church claim any more authority then they? I think not! Each of them have Apostolic lineage and authority through the ancient order prior to the Reformation....... i.e they come from the same "Vine" stem.
Yet, he has found the Apostolic authority important and meaningful to him through the RCC, and I am pleased for him.
But I can also claim that same Apostolic authority through my Reformed/Anglican tradition of which I am a part, and find this equally meaningful.
I enjoyed it parts of it, especially how he seemed to experience so much of the Christian world. I had to stop when he said "the way to know Jesus is to know his mother." To each his own..
Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth. 1 John 3:18
There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. 1 John 4:18a
Become an organ donor ~ donatelife.net ~ www.organdonor.gov
Post-Liberal: That's great that that works for you as a manner of encountering and growing through God. Please be aware that that method is not true for all of your brothers and sisters, and allow them the same freedom as well.
I too have watched "The Journey Home" on several occasions. I even enjoy some of it and learn some things. (I like EWTN in general and watch it from time to time; esp the news show with Raymond Arroyo and the sports guys on Crossing the Goal; and that Father psychiatrist from NYC; and the other New Yorker priest who does the catechism). I am happy for those who find fulfillment in the church to which they are called. My issue with the host (Marcus?) is that he strikes me, due to his smugness, as someone who is constantly asking himself if he made the right choice. I feel I see more of this "RCC is the only real church" attitude from those who have migrated from another faith practice. Just my 2cents as a somewhat occasional viewer.
I hadn't picked up on that but there does seem to be something. I always thought it was due to a sentiment he expressed once about the 'pain' he had because during his pre-RCC days he tried to stir people away from the RCC.
I will watch occaisionally as well.
Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth. 1 John 3:18
There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. 1 John 4:18a
Become an organ donor ~ donatelife.net ~ www.organdonor.gov
Troll post?
"And as we pass the collection plate, please give as if the person next to you was watching."
-Rev. Lovejoy
Good insights. I heard part of this interview in my car. I posted it because I saw he was a former nazarene. Was curious if anyone knew him because of his musical background. Main purpose for posting was exactly what Jim mentioned-the fear that the nazarene church will be in decline as long as it in flux regarding its identity. A large segment of the people converting to RCC are the ages that seem to be declining in the mainline and evangelical churches. Way back when, Robert Webber inferred that was because this age group would finally hit postmodern bottom and long for something unchanging, "otherworldy" in experience and deep in theology. All of these things are lacking in the Nazarene church as a whole and in my husbands (new) American baptist denom. Just food for thought.
Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth. 1 John 3:18
There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment. 1 John 4:18a
Become an organ donor ~ donatelife.net ~ www.organdonor.gov
Thanks Tami. For while we must remember that our main and unchanging theology and philosophy is to preach Christ and Him crucified. We are currently adrift in so many areas. We are finally coming to grips with the untenability of "secondness" as a crisis experience, and my worry is that we may be throwing the baby out with the bath water. While I've never been an adherent of the crisis experience/second conversion, I am firmly in the holiness camp. Our denomination has always been about the spirit filled deeper life experience, we have always been about holy living and the resultant closeness to God that comes from actively seeking Him and His will for our lives. I worry that we may lose this in the shuffle, possibly coming out of this with no real sense of purpose, lukewarm and useless like the mainline denominations.
I believe that you are correct in your assessment that the post modern mindset is permanent in very few folks, most people have always grown out of it. We used to call it the generation gap when I was young, I'm sure that there were various and sundry descriptors for this going all the way back into antiquity. unless we realize that temporal nature of this mindset, unless we realize that for most it is a phase, we will die on the vine. People who are serious, seek out a serious place. I believe that Barna had published a piece on this a few years back where he predicted the demise of evangelical Christianity, his outlook was that the only churches who would emerge healthy were those who were solid in their beliefs, and sadly those who catered to seekers without regard to theology. As in most things, those in the middle of the road get run over.
And thank you for your concern.![]()
-Jim
To know and to serve God, of course, is why we're here, a clear truth, that, like the nose on your face, is near at hand and easily discernible but can make you dizzy if you try to focus on it hard. But a little faith will see you through.
Garrison Keillor
Hmmm ... didn't think of it as proselytizing, Hans. Tho't it was just due to the Nazarene connection, tho' it was a long video. Just did other things while listening.![]()
Life beats down and crushes the soul and art reminds you that you have one.
~ Stella Adler ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
It takes a great deal of maturity to accept that trying to eliminate all risk eliminates life.
~ Susan Lapin ~
On itself, you're probably right. In the context of what Tami has been posting the last couple of months, I'm not so sure. And as I wrote, I'm honest about my bias. I'm allergic to what even smells like it. That is, on a different forum, of course! If people want to post how a RC became a Nazarene on NazNet, fine with me. Or how a Nazarene became a Roman Catholic on an RC-forum, fine as well. Just don't like the "I used to be like you but now I have found the truth and I'm going to convince all you deluded souls" kind ot attitude.
"No scripture can mean that God is not love, or that his mercy is not over all his works" (John Wesley - Free Grace, 26)
I think that the people who believe that the RCC or OC are going to fill some hole that is currently unfilled with a Protestant Church will find that in about a decade (or less) that they're in exactly the same spot, and looking for greener pastures again. Except that by then, they may be so entrenched they have no recourse but to defend their "new" home.
Church cannot satisfies our longing. It is meant to point to that which will satisfy our longing. If we are instead longing for church, we may have the wrong longing.
Of course, we long for those who will share the longing in the way that we do...but then, life may be all about finding bright spots in the middle of continual insufferable frustrations, in any case.
What if you get to "heaven", and God has things that he really needs done that only you can do, and that's the next several thousand years doing those things, acting in service, and you still don't get those things which really please you?
What if there is no mass or church service at all in heaven? If you can be dissatisfied with your experience with God here, chances are, you can be just as dissatisfied in heaven...
Last edited by Todd Erickson; May 21st, 2012 at 06:25 AM.
Today the sermon was on the Apostles Creed line, 'I believe... in the holy catholic church". And, indeed, I do. It's a big tent! Lots of non-believers need, as yet, to get under it. I agree with Hans -- That is our real job.
My responce to the authority issue.
Is accepting RCC authority essential to salvation? No.
Is accepting RCC dogma and doctrine essential to faith or salvation? No.
Is the RCC an infalliable authority? No.
Did the RCC canonize scripture? No, but it helped to do so as part of the greater Church.
Can one be a Christian and follower of Jesus Christ in this life apart from the RCC? Yes
Can one be a Christian and follower of Jesus Christ in this life as part of the RCC? Yes.
Is the Holy and true Church one? Yes
Does it include members from all sorts of denominations including the RCC and Church of the Nazarene? Yes.
I like the ideas here. They all sound good. However, I've never seen a strong, robust ecclesiology offered which is capable of serving for the foundation of such statements and ideas. Generally it rests on a pneumatology which is actually generally separate from the Church in this construction.
- Ben
Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death! And to those in the tombs, bestowing life!
Χριστὸς ἀνέστη ἐκ νεκρῶν, θανάτῳ θάνατον πατήσας! καὶ τοῖς ἐν τοῖς μνήμασι, ζωὴν χαρισάμενος!
Or, maybe I reject postmodernism and its theology because I do understand it.
I'm sorry Dan, you don't, and you've proven it multiple times on NN. The idea that you could treat postmodern theology as a monolithic entity, capable of being an "it" which is rejected as a whole, already shows that you do not understand. I really don't mean to sound like a jerk, but it is immensely frustrating that some of the most orthodox theologians out there have used postmodernity to recover orthodox theology from the ills of modernity, and they're ignored and treated like they're no different than Brian McLaren. Heck, even Catherine Keller, who is on a far more extreme, less orthodox end of postmodern theology is something far different than anything you seem to have addressed any time you've used the term.
- Ben
Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death! And to those in the tombs, bestowing life!
Χριστὸς ἀνέστη ἐκ νεκρῶν, θανάτῳ θάνατον πατήσας! καὶ τοῖς ἐν τοῖς μνήμασι, ζωὴν χαρισάμενος!
You are not sorry. I have nothing to prove. I have very little to say about it because you have't said anything I haven't already heard many times. Post something interesting and original and I might have something to say about it. I might even use a few of your big words in their proper context.
Last edited by Dan Henderson; May 24th, 2012 at 06:26 PM.
- Ben
Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death! And to those in the tombs, bestowing life!
Χριστὸς ἀνέστη ἐκ νεκρῶν, θανάτῳ θάνατον πατήσας! καὶ τοῖς ἐν τοῖς μνήμασι, ζωὴν χαρισάμενος!
If Nazarenes are pressed to choose (as a group, we do not want to have to choose) between seeming extremes, you will find that we will lean towards fundamentalist.
Lets assume two extremes, just for this example I will call them fundamentalism and Post Modern Theology (in reality neither are the extremes)
Fundmentalist ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post Modern Theologist
Most people of any large group are going to try to say away from the edges (extremes), its safer. However if forced to choose, we will choose or at least lean toward fundamentalism. Most Nazarenes agree with most of 5-point fundamentalism. One might even say that most Nazarenes are 4 1/2 point fundamentalists, the only real debate (among Nazarenes) being centered around the word inerrancy and its meaning.
Rail all you want, these are our roots. Any so-called new theology will be measured from this base.
That one day you speak of will not be in either one of our lifetimes.
- Ben
Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death! And to those in the tombs, bestowing life!
Χριστὸς ἀνέστη ἐκ νεκρῶν, θανάτῳ θάνατον πατήσας! καὶ τοῖς ἐν τοῖς μνήμασι, ζωὴν χαρισάμενος!
Ben: I am intrigued by this statement. In my ignorance (and I mean that sincerely, remember I am a biologist not a theologian), my limited experience in this debate would have me side with Dan's statement in post #29 that many (perhaps even most?) Nazarenes are leaning towards about 4.5 fundamentalist (but not prominent Naznet posters to be sure!). To hear you say that any Postmodern or postliberal theologians are 4.5 pointers is very much news to me. Are you using hyperbole here, am I missing some fine point in this debate, what???
BILL
- Ben
Christ is risen from the dead, trampling down death by death! And to those in the tombs, bestowing life!
Χριστὸς ἀνέστη ἐκ νεκρῶν, θανάτῳ θάνατον πατήσας! καὶ τοῖς ἐν τοῖς μνήμασι, ζωὴν χαρισάμενος!
I appreciate that Ben...I am expecting to learn something!
BILL
"No scripture can mean that God is not love, or that his mercy is not over all his works" (John Wesley - Free Grace, 26)
This is a NAZNET HOST POST
Is it possible for us to exercise "Cool heads" and "warm hearts" in our discussions with each other?
I'm sensing some "harshness" in the personal interaction between people of differing points of view, so before we descend into full scale war, let's try to be a little more amicable with each other.
Blessings,
Dave
or, as I instruct kindergartner's when battling a want-to-be bully, "Ignore and walk away". Funny how quickly 5 years old's catch onto that.
-Jim
To know and to serve God, of course, is why we're here, a clear truth, that, like the nose on your face, is near at hand and easily discernible but can make you dizzy if you try to focus on it hard. But a little faith will see you through.
Garrison Keillor
I don't think I personally know many Nazarenes that would say they are in either camp as fundamentalists or as post moderns. Maybe a handful on either side, that's it. I like it that way.
Earlier tonight I saw another disagreement - Red Sox and Rays. Some batters were getting hit with the ball, and when it happened in the top of the 9th the benches hit the field. Grey shirts and red shirts streaming en masse towards each other. Players separating coaches. It was an interesting brawl to watch take place and to watch get broken up. No one was ejected from the game, which I think was the right call. But if it happens again in this weekend's series, and it very well could, I am sure they will.
-Jim
To know and to serve God, of course, is why we're here, a clear truth, that, like the nose on your face, is near at hand and easily discernible but can make you dizzy if you try to focus on it hard. But a little faith will see you through.
Garrison Keillor